Author Archives: Jennifer

07Oct2010

Expecting a showcase of new technology in SH Expo, onto my surprise, there are some pavilions focusing on sustainable development in SH Expo. 

It is not a new topic at all if technology could bring people closer.  It is obvious that technology could bring us a more comfortable life, which the invention of air-conditioner is a typical example.  However, it is always a contradiction that technology could bring people closer on one hand, but deviate people on the other hand.  I don’t mention the arguments here as it’s not the main focus.  What I would like to highlight is our future could not be relied on the development of technology only .

Among the pavilions I visited, the pavilion impressed me most was the pavilion of Estonia.  Almost all the pavilions are showing you their countries, cities, their technology and achievements.  However, in the pavilion of Estonia, it’s a vote.  The concept of Estonia pavilion is SH Expo is a good chance to collect people’s opinions, rather than showing you how their country looks like.  When you go into Estonia pavilion, you could see many giant piggy banks.  There are different issues on the banks, and you can give a vote to the issue that you think is most important to a better city.  After giving your vote, you can move further inside and there are some videos introducing the country, Estonia, in different aspects.  Regardless of the effectiveness of the vote, it gave us some insights of how to develop a better city, and by the decision of using almost 3/4 of the pavilion for collecting people’s opinions, it is worth for showing much appreciation to them.  If you would like to know more about their idea and what the issues are, don’t hesitate to visit their website, http://www.savecity.org/en.  Yes! They made a website for this event and even in both Chinese and English version.  Though it’s not dynamic enough, I still show my appreciation to their efforts.

Though the pavilions of countries are much larger, Zone E, the UBPA displays, should not be neglected.  A typical example is the case of Bilbao.  You could see how a city reform, from an industrial city to a city focusing on tourism and services.  Another example is the case of Madrid.  Its building is surrounded by bamboos, which is the way of building they used for the housing of poor people.  The use of bamboo could shadow the people against sunlight and wind, make them feel cool in the summer and feel warm in the winter.  It is showing how technology and different decision makings bring us a better life in a practical way.

No matter what you got from the SH Expo, it’s a good chance to widen the horizons.  I know more about different countries, cities, and even some places that I have never heard.  Certainly, I would not become an expert immediately.  However, it certainly aroused my interest to some specific countries, and I will search some more information about them when I return home.  The horizon and the arousal of interest are the most precious things in the trip.  You may not increase your knowledge, but certainly will increase your hunger for more knowledge.

04Oct2010

繁忙的香港人何時能放慢腳步,在一個城市內行逛?日常的忙碌早已令我們把身體最真最純的感官封閉。這次楊陽帶來了聆聽體驗活動(sound experience),令我們身心的帶來了一點淨化,就如她所說的:「開」一下感官。

在幾處不同的地方做了簡單的聆聽體驗活動,最先是傾聽身邊周圍的聲音。別以為這很簡單,有說:人的耳朵是會選擇聲音的,一對情侶於一間嘈雜的餐廳聊天,即使他們說話的聲音都很細,他們都能聽到對方的說話。一樣的道理,當你靜心細聽,才發現錯過了多少聲音。也許,人年齡大,感官封閉得太久,很多時候,組員說聽到某些聲音,我才發現到。

除了聽聲音,再進一步的就是聽聲境,就是在一個地方,利用聽到的聲音,重組出該處的環境。這個聲境可與眼見的景象有很大分別,當中可以滲入不同的聯想及個人偏好。

活動的最後一步是要向他人導賞聲境,這個個人覺得很困難,原因之一是本人對音樂及樂器一竅不通,不能用不同樂器把聲境臨摹一遍;其二是假使我能用樂器將之臨摹,這個臨摹也只是反映了我主觀解讀出的聲境,就算以樂器以外的其他方法去作導賞,最後得出的都只是我主觀解讀出的聲境,而非客觀或真實,所以這個導賞就變得導賞我感受的聲境。如何能客觀的導賞一個聲境,或者如何向聽障朋友導賞一個聲境,而同時不限制他們的創作或想像空間,還需要向楊陽多多請教。 

03Oct2010

回到香港後一直在忙,好不容易才能抽空趕文,先上載一點吧:P

香港與上海常常被比較,對上海總有一些特定的觀感。不過到了上海以後,觀感都變得不一樣了。要了解一個地方,必須要親身去一遍才可以。香港是一個生活節奏快的城市。到了上海,心想以我的步速應該可以在這城市快人一步,不過當踏在上海的街道上,就發現身邊的人跟我的腳步一樣快,甚至比我更快,不由得立刻要放下我心中的固有想法,重新了解這個城市,所以說讀萬卷書不如行萬里路,準是沒錯。

以國內地區來說,上海的清潔程度算是不錯,不過與香港比較仍有一段距離。而值得留意的是與人溝通的方法,在上海,我們總是輕易被認出不是本地人,除了口音的問題,還有說話的方式。我們總喜歡在講話前說句「你好」、「不好意思」之類的,但在上海,人們總是一句「哎」後就說正題了。你可解讀此為「沒禮貌」、「親切」、「人與人之間距離近」或是其他,如何解讀,君自行判斷。

同是曾被殖民的城市,在上海,仍然到處可見有殖民色彩的建築,然而在香港,有殖民色彩的建築已越趨少見。雖然,香港的殖民色彩不能見於建築之上,不過相較於上海,香港的殖民色彩更深植人心,香港人的思考模式,教育制度等都深受殖民的影響,相較於建築上的影響,這種無形的影響可能更大。

最後,要說說食物,雖然同是中國,不過上海吃的東西與香港有一定的分別。上海的食物味道較重,油分較多,且多肉,與香港近來流行的健康飲食—少油少鹽、少肉多菜,很不同。說到上海食物,立刻想到的就是小籠包。原來上海除了小籠包外,還有不少食物都是內裏含湯的,就連生煎饅頭(即是我們的生煎包)、鍋貼都像小籠包一樣,內裏含湯,雖然已經喉嚨上火,還是令人忍不住多吃幾個。不過,如果內餡能夠少點肉,加點菜,那就完美了。順帶一提,上海的生煎或小籠包等都是一両両的賣,就連白飯他們都會用両來量的。一両生煎就是四個,而四両就大概是一碗飯,要裝個地道的上海人,就要記得改改口了。

小記:說起殖民建築,看到外灘的時候總有矛盾的心情,既驚歎亦感歎。一是驚歎外灘建築之美,取出廣角鏡,拍出來的照片就像身處歐洲一樣,美得令人驚歎。可惜,同時亦勾起了那一段令人痛心的中國歷史,不由得令人感歎。

17Sep2010

The theme of SH Expo is “Better ciy, Betty life”.  The aims of the Expo are to provide a platform showing the technologies in different countries and to exchange ideas.  Combined with the theme this year, the theme could be interpreted as “How technology brings us a better life?”

In order to see whether the Expo is successful to bring out this message, we have to ask what does “better life” mean?  It is controversial as “better life” is somehow subjective.  Some people may think that “better life” means to have a better physical environment of living, for example, a clean living place.  However, on the other hand, some people may think that “better life” means bringing people closer, in both metaphysical and physical sense.  There are plenty of interpretations for “better life”.  I would take the second example as my interpretation of “better life”.  Could SH Expo make a great success in bringing “better life”?  Let’s clear the mystery together from tomorrow onwards.